Lee Felsenstein just finished his keynote here at NaClCon and it was
a rare shot of hope in an era that often feels dystopian.

He drew a direct parallel between our current AI landscape and the
mainframe days of the 1960s and 70s. Back then, tools were black
boxes, access was restricted to a small cult of users who were, as
his slides put it, "relieved of the need to understand operation",
and the hardware was so massive and resource-heavy that it was
completely inaccessible to the public.

When pioneers started developing microcomputers and personal
computing systems in the 70s and 80s, the reigning powers did exactly
what you would expect: they tried to restrict knowledge of both
hardware and software to keep it in as few hands as possible, at the
greatest possible expense.

As Felsenstein noted, the elite mentality has always been:
"This you shall not know."

History is repeating itself today. We are sliding right back into
that "knowledge for me, but not for you" mindset. Corporate LLM
developers train their models on public data, then turn around and
slap cease-and-desist letters onto indy, reverse-engineered projects
like OpenClaw.

It is the modern equivalent of Bill Gates' famous 1976 "Open Letter
to Hobbyists," which essentially told the early Homebrew Computer Club
to stop sharing the code.

So what do we do about it?

Luckily, we are hackers. According to Felsenstein, our primary
concerns aren't corporate compliance: they are virtuosity, the
respect of our peers, and the liberation of captive information.

When oppressive systems put up arbitrary walls to restrict our access
to knowledge and power, Felsenstein left us with the ultimate
takeaway:

"We can violate the rules, which is our specialty."

---
þ Synchronet þ NaClCON 2026 - history of hacking - May 31-Jun 2 Carolina Beach

foodbark wrote to All <=-

Lee Felsenstein just finished his keynote here at NaClCon and it was
a rare shot of hope in an era that often feels dystopian.

He drew a direct parallel between our current AI landscape and the mainframe days of the 1960s and 70s. Back then, tools were black
boxes, access was restricted to a small cult of users who were, as
his slides put it, "relieved of the need to understand operation",
and the hardware was so massive and resource-heavy that it was
completely inaccessible to the public.

Thank you for sharing this. Sounds like a wonderful conference!


... Don't give Chad a big neural network
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
þ Synchronet þ .: realitycheckbbs.org :: scientia potentia est :.